How to guide for police officers to violate the 4th Amendment Right of Citizens to be FREE from unreasonable searches and seizures
So you have profiled a person as being of low economic status, a minority or homeless and want to run his identification to see if he/she has a warrant or any other particular reason that you want to remove the person from your town or city and are unable to do so because the "Rule of Law" and the Constitution prevents you from doing so. |
Step One: Falsely accuse the citizen of doing something that is criminally suspicioius in nature.
In this incident, Officers Fino and Joy, falsely accused the citizen of looking into the car parked in front of the citizen’s car and the citizen’s own car.
Basically these two cops were insinuating that the citizen was looking into the car parked next to his own as well as his own car in order to commit so criminal act.
The problem with this particular scenario is that there is no evidence that the citizen was looking into any cars including his own car as falsely asserted to by the officers.
Should the citizen refuse to comply with the officers illegal order than move to step two.
Step Two: Become extremely hostile toward citizen and threaten citizen with arrest unless citizen hands over identification.
Step Three: If at this point should citizen continue to exercise his/her Constitutional right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures accuse the citizen of violating muni-code or vehicle code even though the citizen is not in violation of said code.
Step Four: Should the citizen state that he or she is not in violation of the code cited and continues to refuse to hand over identification as is the citizen’s right under the 4th Amendment; accuse the citizen of being under the influence of drugs. Any little quivering of fear on the citizen's part is justification to assume that the citizen might be irrationally paranoid and under the influence. This is usually a slam dunk but if for some reason the citizen is completely coherent and you, the officer, are the one beginning to look foolish and unreasonable and inappropriately hostile, quickly move to step five.
Step Five: Should the citizen continue to refuse to hand over identification as is the citizen’s right under the 4th Amendment; physically grab the citizen and move the citizen to another location even if it is just a few feet to which the justification is for officer and citizen safety. If the citizen has an uncontrollable muscle spasm use, such as a tensed arm muscle, during this period that as a justification to use more force upon the citizen and then arrest citizen for “resisting arrest.”
Step Six: During these moments of using illegally contrived, unnecessary and excessive force upon the citizen yell out, “STOP RESISTING!!” several times so that bystanders or witnesses will be influenced your statement into falsely believing that the citizen had resisted you, the police officer, even though the citizen had not. That way when these witnesses give a statement they will erroneously corroborate your, the police officer’s, false narrative to help justify the illegal use of force used upon the citizen and to wrongfully incriminate the citizen of resisting arrest.
Step Seven: If you happened to record the incident on your patrol car video system or body cam, turn them off, delete the video and claim that you forget to turn them on prior to the contact with the citizen.
That’s how you get the minorities, the homeless, the poor and the powerless of the streets when the Constitution prevents you from doing it legally.
(Be on) "guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism;.." George Washington
Palo Alto Police Officer Daniel Fino
A Representative for the City of Palo Alto, California and the United States. |
If the police can walk up to you and instigate a physical altercation to justify beating you up and charge and prosecute and convict you with resisting arrest by using false evidence in order to cover up their own crimes with impunity than you're Not Free and you do not live in a nation of freedom. That's what Ofc. Daniel Fino attempted to do to do to the citizen in the video and that is what the Palo Alto Police did to to the citizen in 2008.
|
Above is a video of Palo Alto Police Officer Daniel Fino verbally and physically bullying and assaulting a United States Citizen so that he could find out who that citizen is in violation of the Constitution's guarantee to be FREE from unreasonable searches and seizures, the 4th Amendment.
One: Keep in mind that the accusation of looking into cars was false, a lie used to justify approaching the citizen who had only just approached his own vehicle and opened the door to his own vehicle when Officer Fino and Officer Joy rushed down the street toward the citizen upon seeing the citizen open his car door.
Two: Ofc. Joy makes it clear as to why he and Ofc. Fino want to see the identification and that is to find out who the citizen is, see the 23 mark and 1:44 mark of the video. The reason was not because the citizen was violating any municipal code for it is unnecessary to demand identification for a parking violation, additionally the citizen was not in violation of the 72 hour tow violation. Three: Rather than answer the Citizen's question as to what lawful justification Ofc. Fino has in demanding the citizen's identification Ofc. Fino threatens to arrest the citizen by threatening to place hand-cuffs on the citizen unless the citizen provides identification. Ofc. Fino then lies when he says that he is not threatening the citizen. Four: Ofc. Fino physically grabs and manhandles the citizen and then uses his entire body to physically pin the citizen up against the front of the vehicle for approximately a minute during which time Ofc. Fino again falsely states that he is not assaulting/(battering) citizen with his body.
Five: Ofc. Fino asks the citizen why the citizen is acting paranoid. The citizen is paranoid because the citizen knows that Ofc. Fino can initiate a physical altercation without provocation and beat the citizen causing serious injury to the citizen and then arrest the citizen for resisting arrest even though the citizen had not resisted in any manner and then cover up his unlawful assault and battery and false accusation by destroying, editing and falsifying the police videos and other evidence. That is why the citizen is paranoid and instilled with fear due to Ofc. Fino's Unconstitutional behavior. In fact Ofc. Fino was involved in an very similar incident in 2015 in which a person was beaten suffering a broken eye socket and charged with resisting arrest. The two officers who were supposed to be recording the incident, Philip and Fino, did not record the incident. The DA decided not to press charges against the citizen due to contradictory stories. Read Story Here: https://padailypost.com/2019/04/11/newly-released-police-records-detail-violent-takedown-of-shoplifting-suspect/ |
Ask yourself this question, if officer Fino were to do to you what he did to the citizen in this video would
you consider yourself as being FREE as living in a FREE Nation? "The first to state his case seems right until another comes forward and examines him." Proverbs 18:17
Above is Palo Alto Police Chief Robert Jonsen. Ofc. Fino can get away with destroying the U.S. Constitution and eviscerating American Liberty because Chief Jonsen not only condones the violation of the U.S. Constitution for Chief Jonsen actually implemented police policy and practices that violated the Constitutional rights of minorities, African Americans, the poor and the powerless when he was Chief of the Lancaster Sheriff Station in Los Angeles. The U.S Justice Department condemned Chief Jonsen's racist policies and practices.
See all of the evidence here: https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/jonsen-and-keene.html Six: The more important reason as to why the citizen in this video is paranoid is because several years earlier members of the Palo Alto Police actually did falsely arrest and use excessive force upon this citizen without provocation and then edited four audio/video recordings to cover up their actions while wrongly attempting to incriminate the citizen of a crime by using a professionally edited and falsified video.
|
All of the Evidence that proves that the prosecutors from the Santa Clara DA conspired with the police can be viewed here: https://jeffrosenda.weebly.com/da-cover-up.html
The other reason why the citizen is paranoid of Ofc.Fino's actions is because the Palo Alto Polce have relentlessly sought ways to entrap and frame this citizen for a crime in retaliation for exposing their corruption. In fact the video above is strong evidence that that was what Ofc. Fino was actually up to doing.
Members of the Palo Alto Police have slandered and spread false rumors about this citizen to demonize and vilify this citizen who has exposed their corruption. The PAPD has gone so far as to solicit the aid of ex-cons, felons, parolees, probationers, juvenile delinquents, gang bangers, the homeless, business owners and employees in numerous attempts to entrap and frame this citizen in an attempt to silence this citizens from exposing their corruption. Audio from one of their informants threatening this citizen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbhNnfsBGkY |
1) https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/false-arrest.html
2) https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/ 3) https://chiefburns.weebly.com/retaliation.html 4) https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/adrienne-moore.html There have been a minimum of 7 separate incidents between the Palo Alto Police and citizens in which 12 recording devices used by the Palo Alto Police failed to record those interactions. https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/missing-videos.html |
Pattern and Practice of Numerous incidents in which the Palo Alto Police have engaged in unethical and illegal behavior:
https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/pattern-and-practice.html
https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/pattern-and-practice.html